[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Call for testing experimental patch



Chris Travers wrote:
On second thought, there is no consistant naming in the current db so
it doesn;t matter.  I will go ahead and rename it.

There will be ;)

Joshua D. Drake



On 9/20/06, Chris Travers <..hidden..> wrote:
I suppose if people would rather have it called "transactions" I can
rename it transactions.

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

On 9/20/06, Joshua D. Drake <..hidden..> wrote:
Chris Travers wrote:
On 9/19/06, David Tangye <..hidden..> wrote:
On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 13:27 -0700, Chris Travers wrote:
Hi Tony,

I think it is too late to change the name of the table to
transactions, but I will consider it.
Its never too late to correct something, *if* its not right, surely?
You have a point.  But I don't think this is at this point an issue of
one being "right" and the other being "not right" at the moment.  In
this case, I think it is a matter of stylistics.  Both names are
adequate and adequately descriptive, and both names have some slight
shortcomings.
Well this really is semantics. We are essentially dealing with a ledger
there for having ledger in the transactions name is redundant. It
reminds me of people that do this:

tbl_foo
view_bar

Which is silly.

Joshua D. Drake




Hmm, put another way: Ouch, isn't this sounding a tad like the sort of
reaction we did not like when it came out of the SL camp?
If you make a case that it is broken, we will fix it :-)  Right now,
this is a matter of whether we have consistant style and type a few
extra characters or whether we shorten the name a bit and change the
style of the rest of the db as we rewrite it.  I think it is too late
to revisit this sort of decision unless a case can be made that it is
materially wrong.  Otherwise, we can stop coding while we debate in
minute detail the arbitrary decisions made in the coding standards.
:-)

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
..hidden..
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel


--

    === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
    Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
              http://www.commandprompt.com/



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
..hidden..
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
..hidden..
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel



--

   === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
   Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/