On 9/19/06, David Tangye <..hidden..> wrote:
On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 13:27 -0700, Chris Travers wrote:
Hi Tony,
I think it is too late to change the name of the table to
transactions, but I will consider it.
Its never too late to correct something, *if* its not right, surely?
You have a point. But I don't think this is at this point an issue of
one being "right" and the other being "not right" at the moment. In
this case, I think it is a matter of stylistics. Both names are
adequate and adequately descriptive, and both names have some slight
shortcomings.
Hmm, put another way: Ouch, isn't this sounding a tad like the sort of
reaction we did not like when it came out of the SL camp?
If you make a case that it is broken, we will fix it :-) Right now,
this is a matter of whether we have consistant style and type a few
extra characters or whether we shorten the name a bit and change the
style of the rest of the db as we rewrite it. I think it is too late
to revisit this sort of decision unless a case can be made that it is
materially wrong. Otherwise, we can stop coding while we debate in
minute detail the arbitrary decisions made in the coding standards.
:-)
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
..hidden..
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel