[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Clickable Part Numbers
- Subject: Re: Clickable Part Numbers
- From: beamends <..hidden..>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:23:22 +0000
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 21:24 -0800, Chris Travers wrote:
<snip>
> I do a similar thing FWIW.
> >
> > I suspect this usage is "wrong" and I think I have more recently just
> > left the description as "miscellaneous item" and added "binder" or
> > "stationary" or whatever in the item notes, but since the time I
> > started using SQL-Ledger the field was editable, so it "made sense" to
> > edit it.
>
> I am not sure. I would suggest slight refinements to your approach
> rather than overhauling it.
>
> The big thing is that your approach works fine as long as everything
> is set up as a service. If you set it up as a part, I think FIFO
> considerations might bite you if you are also trying to do project
> accounting. I.e. you could end up with the wrong purchase price being
> associated with an invoice. Probably not a big deal for an accounting
> period sinc ethe other invoice would be unlikely to go across periods,
> but if it could skew project balance sheets.
>
> If you set it up as a service, and it is a quick turn-around item,
> then you can just attach it to the project.
>
> However, if this is something like a binder used for a report, you
> probably should be tracking it as petty office supplies instead of
> parts. The simplest way to do this is to use the AP Transaction
> screen and enter directly as an expense and then provide adjustments
> at the end of accounting periods if this is significant.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Chris Travers
The ability to alter the description is quite important here - for some
reason that I wouldn't like to speculate on customers often require the
description to be vague, such as "Lorry Parts" ;-)
Apart from my original need to go to a Part record from an Invoice/Quote
(and for that matter the Goods Inward (Shipping->Receive) form), it
would be good if a change to the part number refreshed the whole line as
it's all too easy invoice for the wrong part at the moment.
Cheers
Richard
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
> _______________________________________________
> Ledger-smb-users mailing list
> ..hidden..
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users