On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Lyle<..hidden..> wrote:
On 30/01/2011 19:17, Chris Travers wrote:
In 1.3, we are using CGI::Simple and use strict for new code. I
expect these to be used in 2.0 as well. I'd like to be able to add
compatibility classes for Catalyst and others if necessary.
Catalyst is a major pain, it adds needless complexity, quickly creates
dependency hell, and you can say goodbye to running smoothly through
CGI. Had to work on it with one of my part time contracts, not a fan at
all. I'm not sure exactly what you mean by compatibility class but
putting LedgerSMB onto Catalyst would be a mistake.
I'm inclined to agree with you on this, actually. The question is for
those who WANT to run it on Catalyst should we provide some method of
support? I don't think we have enough information to answer that at
this time, but I'd like to leave open the possibility.