Re: Choosing which Ledger to use?

[Chris Travers <..hidden..>]

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Lyle <..hidden..> wrote:
> On 30/01/2011 19:17, Chris Travers wrote:
>> In 1.3, we are using CGI::Simple and use strict for new code. I
>> expect these to be used in 2.0 as well.  I'd like to be able to add
>> compatibility classes for Catalyst and others if necessary.
>
> Catalyst is a major pain, it adds needless complexity, quickly creates
> dependency hell, and you can say goodbye to running smoothly through
> CGI. Had to work on it with one of my part time contracts, not a fan at
> all. I'm not sure exactly what you mean by compatibility class but
> putting LedgerSMB onto Catalyst would be a mistake.

I'm inclined to agree with you on this, actually.  The question is for
those who WANT to run it on Catalyst should we provide some method of
support?  I don't think we have enough information to answer that at
this time, but I'd like to leave open the possibility.

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers