[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Persistent connections to database?
- Subject: Re: Persistent connections to database?
- From: "Joshua D. Drake" <..hidden..>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:38:35 -0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:52:39 -0600
Charley Tiggs <..hidden..> wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > It sounds more like a machine level issue (bad configuration of
> > postgresql, not enough IO/RAM etc..)
>
> Josh,
>
> That was my initial thought on the issue and I spent quite some time
> trying to run it down over the three days and didn't see where, how I
> could have misconfigured postgres. If you have more specific
> examples or a resource that is clearer/more specific than the
> documentation at postgresql.org, I'd be happy to do further research
> into the issue.
>
How many connections are we talking about at peak? What type of
hardware do you have?
Joshua D. Drake
> Charley
>
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHPhvrATb/zqfZUUQRAie0AJ44LM7PM/aJF1/qjLem61PEYoXQugCeOoba
UunAO37IPP9P0MICcoDxqnw=
=tFMK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----