[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Persistent connections to database?
- Subject: Re: Persistent connections to database?
- From: "Joshua D. Drake" <..hidden..>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:13:53 -0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:13:35 -0600
Charley Tiggs <..hidden..> wrote:
> Just thought I would ask if persistent connections or even connection
> pooling was possible under such a high load environment to at least
> mitigate that kind of situation.
To be frank that doesn't sound like a connection pool problem. I mean
how many connections is 30 orders creating?
It sounds more like a machine level issue (bad configuration of
postgresql, not enough IO/RAM etc..)
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Charley
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
> ..hidden..
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
>
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHPfoDATb/zqfZUUQRAqpwAJwLkP5lUpyzYvR+vCY84MQOb+2S3ACgnAGo
aS+32mJU9G672/SlLsC092Q=
=kH3+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----