[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: Preventing double-updates
- Subject: Re: RFC: Preventing double-updates
- From: Ed W <..hidden..>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 07:32:28 +0100
Well I think you just highlighted that different sorts of locks are
suitable for different areas of the app! More granular locking is
always nice, but I guess you just need to do whatever is most sensible
given the structure of the app!
I would agree that batch jobs need pessamistic locking though - or more
precisely it's no good getting to the end of your 20 min job and being
told that it failed!
However, I would have thought that editing a Sales Order came under the
heading of where optimistic locking might be more suitable? If we
wanted to get flash we could even try to show a flag at the bottom of
the edit screen showing which other user was potentially editing the
same sales order (wouldn't be all that accurate of course) - the final
arbitration would be when you hit save though
All sounds like great new features though
Ed W