[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GPL v3? Other license options?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Chris Travers wrote:
> Hi John and others,
> 
> My major reason for suggesting that a change to the BSDL would not be good
> is because I think that consistant licensing is good for the community and
> therefore we should try to keep the license as much as possible under the
> same spirit as possible under the GPL v2 or later circumstnaces that existed
> prior to the release of the GPL v3.

I am confused by this statement, GPL v2 is hardly the only major license
out there... Or maybe I am not understanding your point.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

- --

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997  http://www.commandprompt.com/
			UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGy0zyATb/zqfZUUQRAqn9AKCNg4KE8tGI7RZd77P33F3yh/HnUwCdGak+
uNaHWrIk5ujqRiPo95sgP20=
=WTc5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----