Re: GPL v3? Other license options?

["Joshua D. Drake" <..hidden..>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

MJ Ray wrote:
> Christopher Murtagh <..hidden..> wrote: [...]
>>  Sure, but I don't really see the much of an advantage in our case to change 
>> licenses (to v3 or LGPL). At the moment, I don't see the current license 
>> causing any problems or confusion with anyone. Changing licenses makes people 
>> leery though. [...]
> 
> Part of the reason it makes people leery is that often core developers
> start frothing about "RMS kool-aid" and other irrational reasoning.
> 
> Seeing such things from developers of a finance system doesn't give
> many people warm fuzzies, and least of all, any non-core developers
> who are promoting it "out there".  I get spooked by talk of odd
> licences like OSL

Odd licenses like the "Open Source Software License" from the Open
Source Initiative?

Hmmm.. sounds like somebody has been sipping .... ;)

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



- --

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997  http://www.commandprompt.com/
			UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGycmXATb/zqfZUUQRAnkdAJwNJKU3BDRPaV2XAhy8Cyav03s5GQCfepem
vTnyxxPuL5Av+NQtw8ecUN0=
=dMxb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----