[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GPL v3? Other license options?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Josh Berkus wrote:
> On Saturday 18 August 2007 10:47, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> As a core member, if it were up to me, we would ditch GPL all together.
>> I don't subscribe to the ideology present within it nor do I drink RMS
>> brand kool aid.
> 
> Says the man who owns the GPL-licensed ODBCng driver for PostgreSQL?

I don't own it. Command Prompt does and yes, I will use whatever
strategic means I need to, to succeed. That doesn't mean I agree with
RMS. It means that the GPL is a reasonable license to be able to perform
certain business tasks.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


> 


- --

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997  http://www.commandprompt.com/
			UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGyck7ATb/zqfZUUQRAq6SAJ9I6291wk1YytAIQkZCPiDfDIZeDQCfe0Ff
Zk/hWZx1tqK4XQDPGYrdCsM=
=47/K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----