[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: future of LedgerSMB
- Subject: Re: future of LedgerSMB
- From: Seneca Cunningham <..hidden..>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 17:51:45 -0500
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 02:41:58PM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Seneca,
>
> > There is a GL table, it's just that hardly anything uses it, prefering
> > to add up the other tables and storing its values in the acc_trans
> > table. One of my test instances has an entry in it from when I told the
> > system that it was the year end.
>
> Right. In a standard accounting database app, there's a central transactions
> table that stores an analog of classic double-entry ledger records. This has
> a lot of value in preventing errors from unbalancing your books.
>
> acc_trans does some of this, but not for all transactions. I've not been able
> to figure out when it's used and when it's not.
Heh. Can't help much there at the moment, I'm still trying to work out
what happened to the global sequence on a couple of my test instances
that caused them to no longer successfully insert transactions.
--
Seneca
..hidden..