Re: future of LedgerSMB

[Seneca Cunningham <..hidden..>]

On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 02:01:25PM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> In the realm of general structure, I'm uncomfortable with the fact that SMB 
> does not have a GL *table*.  While there's nothing innaccurate with doing the 
> P&L on the fly by adding up AR and AP, it's both inefficient and does not 
> provide us with a cross-checking layer in the database which would make data 
> errors easy to detect and resolve.  So I'd like to explore adding a GL table 
> to the data model.

There is a GL table, it's just that hardly anything uses it, prefering 
to add up the other tables and storing its values in the acc_trans 
table.  One of my test instances has an entry in it from when I told the
system that it was the year end.

-- 
Seneca
..hidden..