Re: Proposal fo version numbering

["Joshua D. Drake" <..hidden..>]

Christopher Murtagh wrote:
> On 10/19/06, Chris Travers <..hidden..> wrote:
>> Are there any objections to going (at least through 2.0) to a scheme
>> similar to PostgreSQL where minor releases only include critical
>> backported security of bug fixes?  This way, instead of 1.1.1d, we
>> would have had 1.1.5....
> 
>  No objections on my part. I think we should definitely do this.
> 
+1

> Cheers,
> 
> Chris
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
> ..hidden..
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
> 


-- 

   === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
   Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate