[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LaTeX templates, was Docmentation/FAQs
- Subject: Re: LaTeX templates, was Docmentation/FAQs
- From: Alejandro Imass <..hidden..>
- Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:40:49 -0400
I just wrote something of the sort. LedgerSMB should make a lot more use
of CPAN than SL did. And I really second the idea of using TT
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 17:34 -0400, Jason Rodrigues wrote:
> I think we should embrace Template Toolkit for this. TT has a lot of
> in the Perl community, and it's syntax is very easy. (And it can work
> directly entering syntax into the OO.o writer!!) We get a lot of
> plugins for
> free, we don't have to deal with any working out any bugs in the
> original SL
> template parser.
> One thing I never understood is why SL doesn't use any perl modules
> outside of
> DBI. I mean, it even parses CGI query params by hand -- CGI.pm 's
> been in
> perl since 5.3 .
> Chris, what do you mean by 'LyX-friendly' ? Are there any specific
> things a
> LyX-Friendly templating system ought to avoid .. ?