Re: Potential security issue with LedgerSMB (inherited from SL)

[Jason Rodrigues <..hidden..>]

>  Cool. So, do we agree that we drop terminal support? I'm ok with
> saying that if folks want this, they can use lynx, links, w3m, etc..
> This would certainly make security issues much easier to deal with and
> help clean up the code somewhat. After all, we are building a web
> based application aren't we?

I'd support that.  If we need/want a terminal based client, that can be 
recreated via the LedgerSMB API , once that precipitates ...


Jason