[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Include this bug fix in next 1.2.x release?
- Subject: Re: Include this bug fix in next 1.2.x release?
- From: John Locke <..hidden..>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:14:50 -0800
Personally, I don't want to take effort away from 1.3/2.x. So now let me
change my mind and say "don't bother" with a checkbox.
On the earlier DVCS dicussion, I'd vote for git (because we already use
it for everything -- and keep a git mirror of the lsmb svn tree here:
git://git.freelock.com/git/ledgersmb.git - browsable at
http://git.freelock.com/?p=ledgersmb.git;a=summary). So I would just
create a new branch for the unpatched version, for those who need the
+1 for making the behavior correct and as expected by default, with a
prominent notice of the fix in the release notes. And I can create an
unpatched branch in my repo if somebody really needs the old behavior.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Ledger-smb-users] [Ledger-smb-devel] Include this bug fix
in next 1.2.x release?
From: Luke <..hidden..>
To: LedgerSMB Users <..hidden..>
Cc: Development discussion for LedgerSMB
Date: Thu 11 Mar 2010 10:45:38 AM PST
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, John Locke wrote:
>> Hi, Chris,
>> Haven't had a chance to read through all the architecture posts. But on
>> this bug fix, YES!!!
>> I've got some immediate needs to run this type of report right now,
>> showing balance due at a particular date and excluding subsequent payments.
>> Would be great to have this as an option on the selection screen,
>> something like a checkbox for "include all payments" vs "include
>> payments before date" for those who might need the current behavior (I
>> personally don't, as long as I'm aware of the change...)
> I was thinking the same, as I actually do see a use for the
> current behavior, and haven't decided what my personal preference is on
> this yet.
> It is clear that the bugfix provides the "proper" and "expected" behavior,
> but getting the current information would not only require running two
> different reports and comparing, but would also not be guaranteed to
> pickup all payments, because future dated ones would still not be
> The checkbox, if possible, would seem the ideal solution, defaulting to
> off of course.
> Something like "include payments posted after report date"
> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> Ledger-smb-users mailing list