[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Where we are going with 1.3
- Subject: Re: Where we are going with 1.3
- From: Jeff Kowalczyk <..hidden..>
- Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 12:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
> On 3/25/07, Chris Travers <..hidden..> wrote:
> > 1) There is some debate (so far, over IRC) over whether to move
> > templates into the database,
> > PRO:
> > a) makes for easier security because we can have full ACL-based support
> > CON:
> > a) makes it harder to edit using a basic text editor.
> > b) adds one more area to the code that will require more extensive
If there's a REST API for getting and setting templates like every other ledger
data item or system preference, then it is probably best to store templates in
It would be a nice to say that ledgersmb backups/migrations/restores can be
handled solely with pg_dump, psql and a single file copy of
Re: testing, this is probably the right place for a template syntax checker or
validator. Don't let the template get saved to the database without checking
for variable names, latex/html lint, whatever other checks can be devised.
I'd like to hear about plans for unit/functional/integration testing soon
anyway, so adding template persistence to the database mix doesn't see like
much more complexity at this point.
The fish are biting.
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.