[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rehash: LedgerSMB Wiki
- Subject: Re: Rehash: LedgerSMB Wiki
- From: "Joshua D. Drake" <..hidden..>
- Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 19:02:19 -0800
> > Could you by chance tell us what you feel Trac would actually give us
> > that we don't have right now? (except for perhaps the timeline?).
> The main impression is that Trac is a good environment for newcomers to browse
> project activity. I think it attracts people to a project's development
O.k. now this is an argument I can buy into.
> Highlights seem to me to be the post-commit-hook ticket workflow, and the
> side effect that such commit messages link changesets directly to (and are
> linked from) tickets.
> Webadmin makes some trac admin delegation feasible. Unified search of tickets
> and changesets is useful.
> The milestone view's graphical sorting of ticket completion, by component,
> per milestone can be a good indicator for users who are asking about release
O.k. these are all very good arguments. My main argument against would
be that it is administratively difficult to manage. For example, I have
zero desire to allow anonymous ticketing. I also have zero desire to
allow anonymous wiki access.
That means we need a signup and confirmation facility.
Joshua D. Drake
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate