[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Status LSMB 1.5;
- Subject: Re: Status LSMB 1.5;
- From: Marjanw <..hidden..>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 09:49:17 +0200
Hi Erik,
Thanks for your comprehensive answer.
I'll investigate 1.5.
Regards,
Marjan
On 2016-06-06 00:15, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> Hi Marjan,
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Marjanw <..hidden.. <mailto:..hidden..>> wrote:
>
>
> I want to setup a new administration for a customer which has a small trading company.
> Planning is to start end June with LSMB entering new orders and inventory.
> >From there catching up all inventory until complete.
> Old accounting system will be kept in place until then.
>
> Is LSMB 1.5 stable enough yet to use in this case, or better use latest 1.4?
>
>
> It took me a while to send you an answer to this question, because a few days ago, it looked like
> exactly the order workflow was one that might have been broken in 1.5. I wanted to take a look at it
> before answering your question. I can't reproduce the issue locally; John Locke (the reporter) is
> going to try and see about reproducing it on the latest 1.5 that's available in development.
>
> If you look at this URL, it contains the currently known issues in 1.5:
> https://github.com/ledgersmb/LedgerSMB/issues?page=1&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A1.5+-label%3Aenhancement+-label%3Atesting
>
> Please note that not all issues noted are bugs (there are also "this should be dealt with, but isn't
> currently broken"-kind of issues). There are no known accounting(workflow) bugs (recognizable by the
> 'bug:accounting' tag). The currently known bugs should not prevent you from getting orders and
> invoices done.
>
> While I'll do my best to help out by solving problems you run into with either using 1.4 or 1.5, my
> own priority lies with fixing problems found in 1.5. However, at this point, I'd say that you're
> more likely to find problems in 1.5 than in 1.4. Unfortunately, I can't commit to any kind of
> timeline to get fixes for either... I did say though that once the code coverage for 1.5 is over 50%
> (now ~ 25%), I'll stop working on 1.4 (because there's simply too much which can be broken too easily...
>
> Hope that helps make your choice!
>
> --
> Bye,
>
> Erik.
>
> http://efficito.com <http://efficito.com/> -- Hosted accounting and ERP.
> Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
> patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are
> consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow,
> J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity
> planning reports. https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/305295220;132659582;e
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ledger-smb-users mailing list
> ..hidden..
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow,
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity
planning reports. https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/305295220;132659582;e
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-users mailing list
..hidden..
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users