Re: Fork: Proposed Architecture Changes in 2.0

[Chris Travers <..hidden..>]

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Luke <..hidden..> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Chris Travers wrote:
>
>>> 2. Being able install into a schema in a database instead of creating a
>>> database and installing.  This would allow a service provider to create
>>> a "company/client" database and have several applications that use it.
>>> In PostgreSQL terms one cluster (server) with many companies (databases)
>>> using several applications (schema).  I have done this for LSMB via a
>>> manual install so it works.
>>
>> Agreed we should provide hooks to this.
>
> All you'd really need is optional table name prefixing, yes?

Schemas are far cleaner :-)

Best wishes,
Chris Travers