[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fork: Proposed Architecture Changes in 2.0
- Subject: Re: Fork: Proposed Architecture Changes in 2.0
- From: Chris Travers <..hidden..>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:00:28 -0800
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Luke <..hidden..> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Chris Travers wrote:
>>> 2. Being able install into a schema in a database instead of creating a
>>> database and installing. This would allow a service provider to create
>>> a "company/client" database and have several applications that use it.
>>> In PostgreSQL terms one cluster (server) with many companies (databases)
>>> using several applications (schema). I have done this for LSMB via a
>>> manual install so it works.
>> Agreed we should provide hooks to this.
> All you'd really need is optional table name prefixing, yes?
Schemas are far cleaner :-)