[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fork: Proposed Architecture Changes in 2.0
- Subject: Re: Fork: Proposed Architecture Changes in 2.0
- From: Luke <..hidden..>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:58:06 -0500 (EST)
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Chris Travers wrote:
2. Being able install into a schema in a database instead of creating a
database and installing. This would allow a service provider to create
a "company/client" database and have several applications that use it.
In PostgreSQL terms one cluster (server) with many companies (databases)
using several applications (schema). I have done this for LSMB via a
manual install so it works.
Agreed we should provide hooks to this.
All you'd really need is optional table name prefixing, yes?