[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fork: Proposed Architecture Changes in 2.0
- Subject: Re: Fork: Proposed Architecture Changes in 2.0
- From: "Joshua D. Drake" <..hidden..>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:24:09 -0800
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 09:07 -0800, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
> Well not really a fork as much as some additional thoughts that I didn't
> see addressed and I wanted to keep them with the thread.
> Two thoughts I'd like to kept in mind while building out v2.0.
> 1. Running multiple "companies" with one web server instance, i.e.
> NameVirtualHost in Apache. This used to be an issue with mod_perl. Not
> sure if it is now. I see two main places where this is useful. An
> accountant might want to host two or more companies on one server and a
> service provider might prefer maintaining one web server verses one per
This can actually be done even if mod_perl does have a problem with it
because we can us set role within the app.
> 2. Being able install into a schema in a database instead of creating a
> database and installing. This would allow a service provider to create
> a "company/client" database and have several applications that use it.
> In PostgreSQL terms one cluster (server) with many companies (databases)
> using several applications (schema). I have done this for LSMB via a
> manual install so it works.
Yes, this would be good.
Joshua D. Drake
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
Respect is earned, not gained through arbitrary and repetitive use or Mr. or Sir.