Re: Usage Requirements Discussion for 2.0

[Luke <..hidden..>]

On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Chris Travers wrote:

> 1)  Would you like to see an interface included in the default
> installation for tracking addon modules and installing them?

My gut reaction to that is: yes, why ever not?

The problem is: how?  It is likely that some of those are going to require 
some extra PERL modules, and surely you don't propose trying to audomate 
that.

Luke