Re: Suitable for artisan?

["Simon Haines" <..hidden..>]

I'm still watching this thread, but haven't yet had a chance to experiment with this. I'd still like to hear if anyone uses ledger in a similar way. I'll post the results of my experiments, which will probably occur over the Chrimbo break.

Simon.

 

Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 05:57:07 -0500 (EST)
From: Luke <..hidden..>
Subject: Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Suitable for artisan?
To: ..hidden..
Message-ID:
       <..hidden..>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

This is probably after the fact, but for my own knowledge if nothing else,
as this is a situation I expect to run into eventually:

On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, Simon Haines wrote:

> Thanks all for the follow-up. I probably won't use a trigger to unify the
> concepts of 'customer' and 'warehouse' because she may eventually want to
> flog her wares on a web site or direct to customers. I think it would be
> better to modify the schema to indicate a customer is a consignment customer
> and tie in the warehouse workflow around that. I'll do some experimenting
> and see how we go.

Just guessing, but couldn't he create a customer group called "consignment
customers", and then when creating a new customer, have that be a
component of the trigger--I.E. if it is not set, then no warehouse is
created?

Been a while since I've actually created any customers (darn it!), so I
could be forgetting something.

Luke