Re: Interesting coverage of our project on the SQL-Ledger-users list

[Luke <..hidden..>]

On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Chris Travers wrote:

> see non-JS usability as a requirement for being able to reasonably do
> accessibility QA.

Agreed, mostly, but given what I proposed a few days ago as the JS 
implementation for this, where do you see the accessibility effects?  It 
changes the UI not in the slightest.

I do not use windows screen readers, but I know that they do handle JS 
effects to at least some reasonable extent.  Regardless, I would not 
suggest depending on that unless we could get some actual Wineyes or JFW 
users in on the testing (I probably could, but it is neither here nor 
there, because...).  I do not see a script which alters the nature of the 
submitted data, as being a problem from an accessibility prospective, and 
am interested in what you think I am missing in this respect.

Luke