[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 1.2.0-rc5 problem with cash receipt
- Subject: Re: 1.2.0-rc5 problem with cash receipt
- From: "Robert Fraser" <..hidden..>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:11:22 +1200
Umm, I may have mis-understood the above discussion, but I did have a date in the form. In fact I changed the default date (which was the current date) to the date the money came into the bank account. Looking at the HTML source, there was a valid value in the form variable (datepaid) immediately before I submitted it.
Thanks for the quick response on this - we are really impressed with LedgerSMB and we are encouraging our customers to have a look.
Cheers
Rob
On 3/28/07,
Charley Tiggs <..hidden..> wrote:
Default to current_date.
Charley
Chris Travers wrote:
> I will get this error fixed today. What is the desired behavior for a
> missing date? Error? default to current_date? What do people think?
>
> On 3/27/07, Joshua D. Drake <..hidden..> wrote:
>> Peter Houppermans wrote:
>>> Hmm,
>>>>> I am getting an error with recording a payment (
1.2.0RC5, Postgres
>>>>> 8.1.8):
>>>>>
>>>>> *DBD::Pg::st execute failed: ERROR: invalid input syntax for type
>>>>> date: ""
>>>>> *Error!
>>>>>
>>>> Well what it is telling you is, the date you supplied for the payment
>>>> is missing :). I don't actully recall if we supply that date or it if
>>>> is supposed to be user supplied.
>>>>
>>> Would be nice if it had a slightly more friendly user decodable error
>>> message - this would scare office staff into calling helpdesks..
>> Sure :), we accept patches.
>>
>> But seriously, you are correct we need to be catching errors but we are
>> currently focusing on a whole slough of other issues right now.
>>
>> Joshua D. Drake
>>
>>