Currently we have 30 repositories in the LedgerSMB github
However, not all of our repositories are named so sensibly.
In particular we now have 4 "packaging" repositories
From the names, it's obscure at best which distro etc each of those repositories is for, more confusing is the fact that the first 3 seem to be duplicates of each other, excepting for the fact that they target different releases of our code.
The first 3 are for debian packages, while the fourth is the new repo Chris has added for gentoo packaging.
To help with "discoverability" and generally make it more obvious
what a repo is for, I'd propose a naming scheme along the
For true "project" repositories such as LedgerSMB, and PGObject
projects $purpose may not make sense, but for others it likely
I think it's probably early enough in the lifecycle of most of
the repositories that could do with renaming to rename them now.
As for having the pkg-ledgersmb-1.x repositories as well as the
unversioned one, Unless Jame has a reason to do otherwise, I'd
suggest we simply use tags in the pkg-ledgersmb repo instead.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list ..hidden.. https://lists.ledgersmb.org/mailman/listinfo/devel