Hi, Currently we have 30 repositories in the LedgerSMB github
project. However, not all of our repositories are named so sensibly. In particular we now have 4 "packaging" repositories From the names, it's obscure at best which distro etc each of those repositories is for, more confusing is the fact that the first 3 seem to be duplicates of each other, excepting for the fact that they target different releases of our code. The first 3 are for debian packages, while the fourth is the new repo Chris has added for gentoo packaging. To help with "discoverability" and generally make it more obvious
what a repo is for, I'd propose a naming scheme along the
following lines. For true "project" repositories such as LedgerSMB, and PGObject
projects $purpose may not make sense, but for others it likely
does. I think it's probably early enough in the lifecycle of most of
the repositories that could do with renaming to rename them now. As for having the pkg-ledgersmb-1.x repositories as well as the
unversioned one, Unless Jame has a reason to do otherwise, I'd
suggest we simply use tags in the pkg-ledgersmb repo instead.
--
Regards David Godfrey SB Tech Services mb: +61 437 286 200 chat:
with dcg_mx at
#sbts:matrix.org (Computer) #sbts:matrix.org (mobile Device) |
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list ..hidden.. https://lists.ledgersmb.org/mailman/listinfo/devel