[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal regarding 1.6
- Subject: Re: Proposal regarding 1.6
- From: "R. Ransbottom" <..hidden..>
- Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:57:56 -0400
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 04:56:46PM +0200, Chris Travers wrote:
> financial rewrite never seems to go the way I would like it to.
I am not sure what the "financial rewrite" is (echoing Erik).
> We have at least one important feature slated for 1.6, and that is the
> multi-currency improvements Erik has been working on. I would like to
Being in the US, I am not much concerned with FX processing. The issue
does always capture my attention, I guess because of its seeming simplicity.
In a bookkeeping sense, it is straight forward. Achieving satisfaction
across varied use scenarios is more interesting.
I have not heard much about Erik's plan.
> suggest we [...] finish App::LedgerSMB::Admin
> and App::LedgerSMB::Admin::Web, [...] replace the current
> setup.pl.
> add a setup wizard and add user
> management functions to the web interface.
> [add] ability to manage multiple LedgerSMB instances from one console, better
> command line management, and restful interfaces for core administrative
> functions.
> move to dojo there and start a 2.x branch of this.
> I would also like to suggest we look closely at [...]
> chart of accounts, or contact management.
>
> Any thoughts on prioritiing these?
All the above is good.
Unit costing/pricing beyond currency precision is first on my
list (mentioned somewhere in this thread).
Chart of accounts versus contact management. I'd go with CoA first--it is
core accounting. Contact management is something people will work around
without much thought.
Rob
Rob
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
..hidden..
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel