[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Upcoming 2.0 of LedgerSMB
- Subject: Re: Upcoming 2.0 of LedgerSMB
- From: "Joshua D. Drake" <..hidden..>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:00:34 -0700
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 03:13 -0430, Walter Vargas wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello from Venezuela
>
> About the intention to eliminate LaTeX, I think, you can have
> something like templates in XML or DocBook, and then convert to other
> formats, including LaTeX. In fact, one of the features that I like is
> that I can make invoices in LaTeX.
That is true.
>
> A few years ago, talked with a partner to migrate the first leg of the
> CGI-oriented code in SQL-Ledger to Catalyst, they are not like the
> idea of bringing the CGI code to Catalyst Framework?
>
This is a possibility but honestly if I were to vote on moving to a
framework it would be with a move to Django or Pylons. Which wouldn't be
nearly as hard as it sounds as a large portion of our work is now *in*
DB
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt