Re: Proposed change for database installation

[Chris Travers <..hidden..>]

On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Adam Thompson <..hidden..> wrote:
> On 2010-Mar-01 11:00, Chris Travers wrote:
>> If we drop the LSMB_NEW_DATABASE variable, we would have to find some
>> other way of flagging the database as one that is supposed to be
>> created.  Do you have an idea in mind for that?
>
> I was actually thinking that the existence of LSMB_NEW_DB would be
> sufficient.  If it's not set and PGDATABASE is set instead, the database
> will not get created.  If PGDATABASE is set, (IIRC) 43-dbtest.t still runs.

Ok.  But that's what we do now :-)

Best wishes,
Chris Travers