On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Roderick A. Anderson
<..hidden..> wrote:
I lost my test install of LedgerSMB before converting it to something
I'd use so I have a blank sheet to work from.
I believe several people have installed and are using 1.3. Since I will
have a very low usage I was thinking I should give 1.3 a whirl instead
of the 1.2 branch then updating. Also I was going to work on what it
takes to make the install in a schema of a database instead of a
database in the cluster.
Any reason to not try this?
It depends on how severe having bugs in your accounting system might
be. I personally don't think there are financial bugs at this point
though when we get to adding invoice drafts, there may be some issues.
I was hoping ot have that in over the weekend, but it will be this
weekend. :-)
I am running one of my businesses on 1.3. My main business is still on 1.2.
And would this be the 1.2-experimental branch?
no, it is trunk.
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
..hidden..
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel