On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:51:07 +0100
MJ Ray <..hidden..> wrote:
> > CC would have the advantage of being the most popular non-code set
> > of licenses, and thus help us on license compatibility more than
> > any other.
>
> How? Many CC licences are mutually incompatible and the most popular
> CC licences are for non-free-software, including anti-commercial or
> anti-modification terms. Don't most people think CC means "free for
> non-commercial use" like BBC TV's Click show announced
> week-before-last?
>
> Please use something simpler, like BSD-style.
I think this license seems reasonable:
Attribution-Share Alike 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/legalcode
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature