Christopher Murtagh wrote:
You'd be better off porting SugarCRM to postgresql. That would be relatively simple compared to what it would involve to even attempt to port LedgerSMB or SQL-Ledger to mysql. At least you know going in that what you would be trying to accomplish (by adding postgresql support to SugarCRM) is actually possible.On 10/7/06, m o <..hidden..> wrote:here's a suggestion . . . ever think of porting this to mysql?Actually, we're moving in the opposite direction. As LedgerSMB diverges from SQL-Ledger, one of the big differences will be that we will make proper use of PostgreSQL's features as well as rely more on stored procedures. This means that porting to another DB (one that is quite inferior, IMO), is something that would be considered wasted energy to most of us.
Darrick -- Darrick Hartman DJH Solutions, LLC http://www.djhsolutions.com