[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Beyond 1.2: Contact management requirements



Replying all since gmail is still having issues with sf.net....

So, suppose one were to have a single primary billing contact
associated with a company, and then multiple supplimentary contacts
(shipping, misc)?  Would that be sufficient?

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

On 10/2/06, Josh Berkus <..hidden..> wrote:
Chris,

> I am wondering what sort of requirements people have for contact
> management for LedgerSMB.  I am looking at making the customers/vendors
> handling a major priority for my work on 1.3.  Among other issues:
> 1)  The customer and vendor tables will likely be merged.
> 2)  The contact records will be made aware of standard extended fields
> for "contact," "customer," and "vendor" entities.

Multiple "people" associated with a "company", each with phone/email.

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
..hidden..
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel