Re: Beyond 1.2: Contact management requirements

["Chris Travers" <..hidden..>]

Replying all since gmail is still having issues with sf.net....

So, suppose one were to have a single primary billing contact
associated with a company, and then multiple supplimentary contacts
(shipping, misc)?  Would that be sufficient?

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

On 10/2/06, Josh Berkus <..hidden..> wrote:
> Chris,
>
> > I am wondering what sort of requirements people have for contact
> > management for LedgerSMB.  I am looking at making the customers/vendors
> > handling a major priority for my work on 1.3.  Among other issues:
> > 1)  The customer and vendor tables will likely be merged.
> > 2)  The contact records will be made aware of standard extended fields
> > for "contact," "customer," and "vendor" entities.
>
> Multiple "people" associated with a "company", each with phone/email.
>
> --
> --Josh
>
> Josh Berkus
> PostgreSQL @ Sun
> San Francisco
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
> ..hidden..
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel