Re: Proposal: New web site maintainers

["Joshua D. Drake" <..hidden..>]

On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 11:00 -0700, John Locke wrote:
> Hello,

> One other potential reason to move: the power tools for managing Drupal 
> (drush being the main one) now depend on relatively recent versions of 
> PHP -- at least PHP 5.2. Your server's reporting 5.1.6. That can mean 
> the difference between 45 minutes doing an update, or 45 seconds. (and 
> yet many Drupal modules are only now becoming compatible with PHP 5.3...)

Upgrading to 5.2 is a simple yum update and I certainly not opposed to
it.

> 
> > 3. A small www team to help manage content and keep the website up to
> > date.
> >
> > This is the part that we need to community help on.
> >
> >    
> 
> It does sound like there are several people on the list volunteering to 
> help, we just need access and to agree on some guidelines.
> 
> What's next?

Let me talk with the rest of core.


-- 
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt