Re: Upgrading from SQL-Ledger 2.6.22 to LedgerSMB 1.3

[Alvin Starr <..hidden..>]

Well you can sign me up.

On 10/02/2011 11:05 AM, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 5:25 AM, Ross Bearman
> <..hidden..> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm currently looking to migrate from SQL-Ledger over to LedgerSMB. I read
>> one the migration help page that 2.6 > 1.1.12 was recommended. But I'm not
>> sure if this has changed with 1.3?
>>
>> Would it be better to update SQL-Ledger to 2.8 than migrate, or migrate to
>> 1.1 than update to 1.3?
> 
> The simplest thing to do is to migrate to 1.1.12, then to 1.2.x, then
> to 1.3.0, but I am currently running a pilot program testing our
> migration capabilities, and would be happy to:
> 1)  Migrate you to 1.2.25 and then
> 2)  Migrate you to 1.3.0
> 
> I am making a limited offer for migration assistance and have a few
> spaces left in it, if you are interested, the work would be provided
> free of charge as a way of providing better testing and feedback of
> the migration capabilities.
> 
> Best Wishes,
> Chris Travers
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2
> _______________________________________________
> Ledger-smb-users mailing list
> ..hidden..
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users


-- 
Alvin Starr                   ||   voice: (416)585-9971x690
Interlink Connectivity        ||   fax:   (416)585-9974
..hidden..              ||