[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LAN Setup
- Subject: Re: LAN Setup
- From: Michael Richardson <..hidden..>
- Date: Sat, 02 May 2009 23:25:38 -0400
>>>>> "David" == David A Bandel <..hidden..> writes:
David> 169.254.0.0/16 is a "zeroconf" address -- it's what Windoze
David> uses when it gets lost (can't figure out what it's address
David> should be), but there are zeroconf utilities for Linux and
That's not fair.
Windoz does get lost lots, but 169.254.0.0/16 was allocated
specifically for zeroconf, and it's a legitimate way to do networking.
That windoz fails into using their network, and often route 0.0.0.0/0
to this LAN, so anyone within wireless listening of you can hijack *ALL*
your traffic, is certainly a sin, but...
As you say, Linux and Mac (and Cisco and ...) can easily participate
in such a network, which usually is what you would permit to be
configured if you and your friends are having a LAN party in the middle
of the park.
I would not call it a bogus address for this reason.
It's not crazy to use this on your LAN, given Bonjour/LLDMS/mDNS/Avahi
(whichever you want to call it), you can use it along with a stable
name.
I just don't recommend it either.
--
] Y'avait une poule de jammé dans l'muffler!!!!!!!!! | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] ..hidden.. http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [