Re: Role of CRM and LSMB, was Re: RoadMap Question

["Joshua D. Drake" <..hidden..>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:11:58 -0800
"Chris Travers" <..hidden..> wrote:


> 
> Do we really eventually want all tables to be loaded for all users
> anyway long-run?  Or would it be better to have per-module table
> definitions and upgrade scripts?

Not all but in this case it would tightly couple with projects, work
orders, tasks etc...

> 
> I have some tables (reasonably well-normalized) you could review if
> you really want to get this in as a marketing bullet point, but my
> view is that we should worry less about marketing features which will
> be incomplete for the foreseable future than about.  My previous
> tables could use some minor re-design (in handling subscriber v.
> owner handling) but are *way* more flexible than anything I have ever
> seen in other CRM's.

Sure, I am not looking at this from a let's make plastic paper look
good. I am just saying that from a consistency stand point it would be
useful as we push into the other features that need work for 1.4
(projects, estimates, workorders).

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake
- -- 
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director |  PostgreSQL political pundit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHn3ZCATb/zqfZUUQRAhL0AJ49UW3iOvHyaBm4LVyr1/IgT1SoWgCfeKKf
XSMkezoKPeW/Tm64sf5+LRY=
=xFWG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----