> <mailto:
..hidden..>> wrote:
>
> Everyone -
> Is there any interest in EDIFACT for LedgerSMB? There is an article
> /dicussion paper at
>
http://www.schlegel.li/ebXML/linmagau_article/linmagau.ps> <
http://www.schlegel.li/ebXML/linmagau_article/linmagau.ps>. I
> also notice
> that there some limited discussion on this topic among the S-L users.
> There is also
http://openebxml.sourceforge.net/ which seems to
> have gone
> quiet now.
> My apologies for not being an active paticipant over last months -
> pressure of other projects.
>
> I am interested in what others feel about finding a truly
> effective B2B
> and B2C solution. I am also interested in assisting if there is a
> group
> of similarly motivated people.
>
>
> Yes, there is interest. The quite spell has been due to the
> perception that it is somewhat difficult to do at the moment. I think
> the most important thing that can be done is to open up discussions of
> technical requirements on the -devel list.
>
> (Also any user-exposed interfaces should be discussed on this list,
> though I suspect that EDI is probably less of an issue here.)
>
> One area you should be aware of is that EDI may work well with the
> batch and separation-of-duties interfaces we are working on for 1.3.
>
> Best Wishes,
> Chris Travers
>
>
>
> Regards,
> David Sentinella
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> It's the best place to buy or sell services for
> just about anything Open Source.
>
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace> _______________________________________________
> Ledger-smb-users mailing list
>
..hidden..