Re: Question whether to drop support for Apache 2.0 < 2.0.44

["Joshua D. Drake" <..hidden..>]

Chris Travers wrote:
> Hi all;
> 
> I am wondering what people think of dropping support for Apache from
> versions 2.0.0 through 2.0.43 as of LedgerSMB 1.3.  These versions
> have a bug in them which we currently work around involving escaping
> urls.  The bug was corrected in 2.1, 2.2, and 2.0.44.

Most current distributions would be running 2.0.5x so I am fine with that.

J


> 
> My own preference is to assume that bugs fixed in a stable branch of
> software should be deemed fixed in our code as well.   This helps
> encourage people to be up to date (within the stable branch) and
> therefore helps encourage better security.
> 
> But if these updates are not readily available to users, I think we
> should still support the older version.  Any feedback?
> 
> Best Wishes,
> Chris Travers
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Ledger-smb-users mailing list
> ..hidden..
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
> 


-- 

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/