Re: Installing LedgerSMB into a schema?

["Chris Travers" <..hidden..>]

Just a quick note on this before I address your previous post.

Right now there seems to be some thought that moving LSMB into a
separate schema makes sense.  I am all for this idea.  However, I am
not sure it makes sense for multi-company setups to have companies as
schemas in part because it would prevent us from securely breaking the
reporting functionality into its own schema.

Also, in a case like that, it would prevent us from really leveraging
the use of schemas to create interop between products as you are
trying to do in a secure fashion.  Or at least it would make that a
great deal harder.

Just some thoughts.

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

On 11/6/06, Charley Tiggs <..hidden..> wrote:
> Chris Travers wrote:
> >> The issue of combining sets of accounts via views/joins across
> >> schemas/sets of accounts sounds interesting, but I wonder if this is
> >> really of any use to 99% of users; vs the idea that a database is a
> >> discretely secure container of each company/client's sets of accounts.
> >>
> > There is also a question of whether 99% of users will have
> > multi-company setups...
>
> I have the possibility of multi-company setups but I also have the means
> to create as many dbs as I want/need.  Like I mentioned previously, not
> all hosting solutions offer the flexibility that mine does.
>
> Charley
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Ledger-smb-users mailing list
> ..hidden..
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users