Coverage of code in our Starman process not counted?

Subject: Coverage of code in our Starman process not counted?

From: Erik Huelsmann <..hidden..>

Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 10:03:27 +0100

Hi all,

After implementing BDD tests for setup.pm, our coverage % hasn't changed the slightest. While I had serious doubts that the code coverage hadn't changed, I left it alone, since we have lots of items to work on. OTOH, I'd really like to see a coverage figure which resembles actual code tested, so I started looking at it again.

https://github.com/pjcj/Devel--Cover/issues/50 suggests that there's no way to have starman figures extracted correctly. The same post suggests using HTTP::Server::PSGI (which comes with Plack) will work around this problem.

Does anybody have experience with this? Or even better, any help to get a solution which extracts and reports the coverage information would we highly appreciated!

Bye,

Erik.

http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP.

Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140