So it looks like there is a significant improvement in our testing in 1.4 compared to 1.3, where any db load issue is found and causes a test case failure, while in 1.3, we don't have full db module coverage.This is something we will definitely have to keep in mind when we see test failures in 1.4 (this problem was found in 1.4 and fixed but the tests continued to pass in 1.3 only).Best Wishes,Chris TraversOn Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Chris Travers <..hidden..> wrote:ouch. patch applied.I wonder if I accidently reverted a patch or why the Travis CI tests (which do test db load btw) didn't fail.--On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Pongrácz István <..hidden..> wrote:
I guess this is a brand new DB.
Check this patch:
diff -u Employee.sql Employee.sql-fixed
--- Employee.sql 2014-09-05 15:13:49.009844457 +0200
+++ Employee.sql-fixed 2014-09-11 22:58:12.264103592 +0200
@@ -9,7 +9,8 @@
DROP FUNCTION IF EXISTS employee__save
(in_entity_id int, in_start_date date, in_end_date date, in_dob date,
in_role text, in_ssn text, in_sales bool, in_manager_id int,
- in_employee_number text)
+ in_employee_number text);
+
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION employee__save
(in_entity_id int, in_start_date date, in_end_date date, in_dob date,
in_role text, in_ssn text, in_sales bool, in_manager_id int,
The problem I guess is about there is a missing ';' at the end of the sql statement in the sql/modules/Employee.sql file.
Bye,
István
----------------eredeti üzenet-----------------
Feladó: "Michael Richardson" ..hidden..
Címzett: "Development discussion for LedgerSMB" ..hidden..
Dátum: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:18:14 -0400
-------------------------------------------------
>
> The setup.pl, "Add User" function results in:
>
> Error!
> No such function: employee__save
>
> --
> ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
> ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
> ] ..hidden.. http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> Want excitement?
> Manually upgrade your production database.
> When you want reliability, choose Perforce
> Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ost
> g.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
> ..hidden..
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
..hidden..
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
Best Wishes,Chris TraversEfficito: Hosted Accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.--Best Wishes,Chris TraversEfficito: Hosted Accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list ..hidden.. https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel