Re: Proposal for 1.5: Move LedgerSMB to Dancer

[Philip Rhoades <..hidden..>]

Chris,

I would prefer moving to Rails . . but given that that is not going to 
happen - Dancer looks good!

Phil.


On 2014-08-11 14:42, Chris Travers wrote:
> Hi all;
> 
> There has been some discussion in the past I have had with folks about
> moving LedgerSMB to Catalyst.  The concern I have is that as Catalyst
> is a fairly large framework it isn't clear how much we'd be using very
> light aspects of the framework and how much dependency overhead we'd
> have.
> 
> I am going to propose dancer instead, as it is a light-weight
> framework for HTTP-based web apps (for those familiar with Python,
> Flask was inspired by it).
> 
> This is still likely to be a significant change but I think it is
> manageable.
> 
> --
> 
> Best Wishes,
> Chris Travers
> 
> Efficito:  Hosted Accounting and ERP.  Robust and Flexible.  No vendor
> lock-in.
> http://www.efficito.com/learn_more [1]
> 
> Links:
> ------
> [1] http://www.efficito.com/learn_more
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
> ..hidden..
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel

-- 
Philip Rhoades

GPO Box 3411
Sydney NSW	2001
Australia
E-mail:  ..hidden..

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
..hidden..
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel