On 03/29/2012 08:56 PM, Chris Travers wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Roderick A. Anderson <..hidden..> wrote:On 03/29/2012 07:21 PM, Chris Travers wrote:On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:16 PM, David Godfrey<..hidden..> wrote:Hi Chris, Totally agree regarding editors for programming. BUT, I thought that the purpose of this script (and hence the spawning of an editor) was to add a tool to assist installing (and possibly maintaining) LedgerSMB on a production system. If I am wrong in this assumption then my comments regarding nano are superfluous. On the other hand if I am right and the average "user" (ie: small business) will be running the script I stand by my comment.I think it is sensible to default to nano in this case for the simple reason that the basic commands are at the bottom. However, I would want someone to confirm that nano is installed by default on *BSD systems as well before I make this change.Another option would be to check for (and use) EDITOR or VISUAL from the environment and fall back to nano or whatever if they're not.I previously checked before sending the last email and the script in question in fact already does this, except that it falls back on vi.
Sounds good. I must have jumped in the middle and missed that. Sorry. Rod --
Best Wishes, Chris Travers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list ..hidden.. https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel