[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: a proposal to reorganize files

>>>>> "Chris" == Chris Travers <..hidden..> writes:
    Chris> 2) Support a make install-based approach.  Right now make
    Chris> install creates significant supportability issues.  However,
    Chris> if we allow one to make install, it could be downloaded into

    >> Ah, you thought perhaps I wanted to insist on "make install".
    >> Just the opposite... I want to *support*, but as a developer, I
    >> don't want it at all.

    Chris> What's the problem with make install?

1) you have to install somewhere.... 
2) ^X^S, shift-reload is way faster.
3) ^X^S, "make check" is way cooler.

So, I *want* make install for packaging and target system use, but I
would like to maintain the run-in-current-directory system.  I think we
can have both.

]       He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life!           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] ..hidden.. http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
   Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
	               then sign the petition. 

Attachment: pgpZb5IM9HdFl.pgp
Description: PGP signature