>>>>> "Chris" == Chris Travers <..hidden..> writes: Chris> 2) Support a make install-based approach. Right now make Chris> install creates significant supportability issues. However, Chris> if we allow one to make install, it could be downloaded into >> Ah, you thought perhaps I wanted to insist on "make install". >> Just the opposite... I want to *support*, but as a developer, I >> don't want it at all. >> Chris> What's the problem with make install? 1) you have to install somewhere.... 2) ^X^S, shift-reload is way faster. 3) ^X^S, "make check" is way cooler. So, I *want* make install for packaging and target system use, but I would like to maintain the run-in-current-directory system. I think we can have both. -- ] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[ ] ..hidden.. http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[ Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE> then sign the petition.
Description: PGP signature