Re: future coding standards for stored procedure names

[Chris Travers <..hidden..>]

On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:26 AM, herman vierendeels
<..hidden..> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> This is a bit new to me.
> Could you tell a little more about the function of a separator in a
> stored_procedure name?
> Is this separator meant to be interpreted in pre-db code or in the db itself?
>
> Object oriented guys would prefer object->method syntax.

Long-run I would like it to have semantic value for method discovery.
It will always be pre-database, but it may eventually be important for
discovery.

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers