Re: Error Handling in 2.0

[Chris Travers <..hidden..>]

On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:46 AM, John Locke <..hidden..> wrote:
> Ok this might be a dumb noob question, but why use some hexadecimal
> notation of the module? Why not just the string module name?

I was thinking about having a much more compact error notation.  Maybe
the namespace it is called from would be a good thing to use instead
though.

As for the error ID, I am wondering if it might be better to use a
short string as well.  That way we could use SQL State codes as error
id's as well.

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers