[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should we switch to a dcvs for 2.0?
- Subject: Re: Should we switch to a dcvs for 2.0?
- From: Michael Richardson <..hidden..>
- Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:37:49 -0500
>>>>> "Chris" == Chris Travers <..hidden..> writes:
Chris> As we move more to an addon-centric model, it seems to me we
Chris> have two choices:
Chris> 1) We could recommend that addons get their own project space
Chris> on sourceforge, etc
Chris> 2) We could move to a dcvs and if
Chris> Sourceforge does not provide sufficient permission management
Chris> facilities, move elsewhere.
Chris> What to folks think?
Both are required.
The system must come with a rich set of plugins/addons out of the box.
New things go into (2). When something is mature, and is of general
interest, it needs to go into (1).
--
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] ..hidden.. http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
then sign the petition.